Saturday, March 9, 2019
Narrative Argument About Education Essay
Reading the nett is non the standardized as recital in the book or magazine or even newspaper. The information that you read from the internet whitethorn not stick with you as long as it would if you were to read a book, newspaper, magazine, or journal. This sackt be a hundred portion blameless for e actuall(a)yone, only when according to most people that I bring forth questioned, the information that they read from the web/internet doesnt stick with them as long as it does when they read an actual book, newspaper, or magazine.Personal computers can be empowering tools in a focal point of learning ab push through technology, but in my opinion they do no good for learning when it comes to minute view skills and gaining accurate information for yourself. Most of the web pages that be out there are not even filled with accurate information. If there is no context on the web for the explore you are sounding up, then neither is there any history for it. Nothing online ha s been indexed ahead 1980, so therefore the information is not completely accurate and paid neckledge.According to Judith Levine, most of the data her students net are like methamphetamine hydrochloride fish, and by that I feel like she means that the information that they pull in is worthless and testament not inspection and repair them in any way. I would attain to say that I can agree with her statement because as a web surfer myself I dont find how it helps me. Yes, it does give me certain education in the information that I am surfing well-nigh, but it does and go away not help me as more than as it would if I were to read a book about that very same subject. I can gain more knowledge and donjon it memorized with a book much easier than I can surfing the web.Judith duologue about her students not being able to concentrate when she asks them to organize their impressions into unyielding stories, and I find that to be due to the lack of critical view skills from no t culture books anymore and using this computer technology for all of their research and surfing articles. I feel like students dont get the full education of the subject that they need when they conciselycut it by using the web for their papers. I agree with Judiths statement about the diagnosis of an epidemic attention famine disorder. It can be caused by the casual clicking and pointing that has come to stand in for intellectual inquiry.Technology may empower, but when will the power of it be used? Students dont read anymore and so their critical thinking skills are not as great as they could be if they would just read instead. They should be nurture books like literature, history, poetry, and politics so they can be audition to people who know what they are talking about. Otherwise, the information they get will be of no use to them. The search engines that retrieve more than 100,000 tie in or none at all, they will be awkward at discerning meaning, or discerning at all (P aragraph 14).After practice session the story of Judith Levines argument about using the web for research papers versus reading books, I can feel like I totally agree with her on every aspect. Because reading makes you use your brain. temporary hookup reading you would be forced to reason out many things which are unfamiliar to you. Reading improves your vocabulary Remember in elementary school day when you learned how to infer the meaning of one word by reading the context of the other words in the sentence? You get the same benefit from book reading. While reading books, especially challenging ones, you will find yourself exposed to many new words you wouldnt be otherwise.Reading also improves concentration and focus. It requires you to focus on what you are reading for long periods. Unlike magazines, internet posts or e-mails that might contain itty-bitty chunks of information, books tell the whole story. Since you must concentrate in order to read, like a muscle, you will ge t better at concentration only when like Judith talked about in her argument, she feels like the etiology of attention deficit disorder is due to the fact that students these days are not reading books anymore, but are only surfing the web which doesnt help the brain to focus and concentrate.When students surf the web for answers there is no way of them being able to know if any particular fact is accurate or not. simply when they read books it gives them better information that is sure to be accurate. So, when Judith Levine argues the point that she feels reading books, magazines, newspapers and etc. are better that surfing the web, I would bear to agree with her because it help us in our comprehension, practices our fluency, and many others. But nowadays, because reading books is boring and you have to read for almost a hebdomad or month, students today are so lazy to that and they always have the speech of, its a waste of timeUsing calculator is widely practice todays generat ion. It is almost needed in the society. You can also be called an illiterate when you dont know how to use it, because even a 7 years old cod can use the computer. Computers are easy to use, reliable, fast, and consume a short period of time I believe that is why in the rootage of Judiths argument she quoted Bill Gates statement after he bestowed a $200 million gift to Americas usual libraries so they could hook up to the internet and I understand why he would feel the way he does about computers because of how popular they are in todays society, but in my opinion I feel that they are not as empowering as people front to think that they are. They will not give you the education and critical thinking skills that you need like books will do for you. So, therefore I would have to agree with her argument towards Bill Gates decision and statement.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.