Materialism vs Idealism :: essays papers

Materialism vs Idealism invoice tells us very little of Titus Lucretius Carus, merely one female genitals getfrom reading his workplace that he has a strong dislike towards spiritual superstition,which he claims is the root of human fear and in turn the have of impiousacts. Although he does not deny the existence of a god, his work is aimedat proving that the world is not guided or controlled by a divinity. Lucretiusasserts that matter exists in the plaster bandage of atoms, which move around theuniverse in an empty space. This empty space, or vacuity, allows for themovement of the atoms and without it everything would be one mass. He explainsthat matter and vacuity can not occupy the same space, ...where in that respectis empty space, there matter is not..., and these two things makeup the stallion universe. These invisible particles come together to formmaterial objects, you and I ar made of the same atoms as a chair or atree. When the tree dies or the chair is thrown in to a fire the atoms donot burn up or die, but are spread back into the vacuity. The atomsalone are without mind or secondary qualities, but they can combine toform living and thinking objects, along with sound, color, taste, etc...Atoms form life, consciousness, and the soul, and when our body dies thereis nothing left of the latter except for its parts, which promiscuously becomeparts of other forms. Matter is never ending reality, exclusively changing inits form. In the philosophical system developed by Irish philosopher GeorgeBerkeley, Idealism, Berkeley states that physical objects, matter, do notexist independent of the mind. The pencil that I am writing this essaywith would not exist if I were not perceiving it with my senses, but inthe dialogue between Hylus and Philonous Berkeley attempts to show thingscan and do exist apart from the human mind and our perception, but thobecause there is a mind in which all ideas are perceived or a deity thatcreates perception in the hum an mind, all way its God. He says thatthe external world can not be understood by thought, but sensiblethings, objects that we perceive, can be reduced to ideas in themind. These ideas, or objects before the mind, possess primaryqualities, the primary(prenominal) structure, and secondary qualities, what we derivefrom our senses, which are inseparable. Im confused somewhat this, if Imthinking about a star in a different galaxy, which makes the star an objectbefore my mind, then where are the secondary qualities?