Comparison of Crime and Punishment and Julius Caesar Essay

William Shakespe ars famous play Julius Caesar write in 1608 is here comp ard with Crime and Punishment written by Fyodor Dostoyevsky in 1866. Whereby the two authors lived in completely different times, both texts had similarly established their storylines around patrons who committed crimes based on theories they believed in. For example, Brutus from Julius Caesar commits murder be father of his patriotism while Raskolnikov commits murder with his vox populi in the bermensch theory.This similarity has then brought further realization of similar depiction of protagonists between the authors. Such similarities are prevalent by the manner the protagonists conceal their emotions from engaged with their paths to greatness. This ultimately leads to each protagonists act of digging their own hole, whereby they alienate themselves from those they slam. Hence this allowed for the ambiguous response from the audience, as we are shaped into the capacitance of hating and loving the prot agonist from both texts. Thus, though these internationally-acclaimed texts were written by authors of different eras, a similarity exists in the fashion they have portrayed their protagonists.Primarily, both protagonists squeeze their love for others in their search for greatness. The protagonist of Julius Caesar, Brutus, describes his annulion to his friends, not that I loved Caesar lessas he was ambitious, I slew him. There is crying for his love. (Shakespeare, 3.2.26-27) The first sentence of this quote affirms the protagonists inevitable love for his friend Caesar, whom Brutus conundrumically ends up murdering later on emotional debates. Shakespeare has interestingly employed paradox in this quote to further corroborate Brutuss dominant characteristic of nobleness, when Brutus declares his true patriotic themes in murdering Caesar. Tears in the last sentence conveyed a sorrowful and regretful tone. This suggests Brutuss inner conflict, which is his attempt to suppress his affection toward his friend in order to kill Caesar. The protagonist of Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov, also strives to suppress his compassion.Raskolnikov questions himself after helping a drunken girl, Is it for me to do that? And how could I ever have gone and given away those twenty copecks? (Dostoyevksy, 62) This quote demonstrates a sharp shift of mood, as Raskolnikov just shows his angelic side by helping others and now his demonic side takes over. These actions reflect the motive of dual personalities. The above collar elements garnish Raskolnikovs inner turmoil in suppressing his angelic side. Thus it is ironic that he exclaims he shouldnt have given away money, to date later gives money to Sonyas family. Raskolnikovs failure in suppression foreshadows his failure as a super valet de chambre.Although both protagonists share the characteristic of suppressing their love for others, they place upright different consequences. In Julius Caesar, Brutuss suppression of lo ve for Caesar isnt clearly interpreted by Antony, who tells all, how dearly Caesar lovd him (Brutus) This was the most unkindest cut of all thenall of us fell down. (Shakespeare, 3.2.180, 181, 189) Antonys such realization reveals his shrewdness and true, open love to Caesar, in contrast to his foil, Brutuss, suppressed love. Ironically, Antonys manifestation of his love for Caesar foreshadows Brutuss tragic downfall. Through this, Shakespeare is able to criticize the suppression of emotions. In Crime and Punishment, the protagonist Raskolnikov has a better fate than Brutus. He confesses his crime to Sonya, who he had sought a human being, when he needed one. (Dostoyevsky, 621) This quote reveals the theme of common suffering and understanding.Raskolnikovs suppression of compassion has resulted in his physical and mental suffering. As Sonya is also subject to poverty, Raskolnikov knows she may understand his torment and help him find salvation. In both texts, the authors depicted h ow protagonists are forced to suppress emotions for others in spite of the differences in the consequences of their actions. Theres no permission or prohibition involved (for the extraordinary people). he (the ordinary person) will suffer when he realizes the delusion of his waysSecondly, the protagonists both choose to abandon their families and isolate themselves. In Julius Caesar, Portia questions Brutuss behaviour, And when I askd you what the matter was, / You stard upon me with ungentle looks. / still I insisted, yet you answerd me not. (Shakespeare, 2.1. 241, 245) Through this quote, readers are introduced to the protagonists alienation of wife Portia due to his patriotism. Brutuss insistent isolation denies the idea of emotional weakness, which is possessed by his foil Caesar when Calpurnia persuades him to stay home. The sharp contrast between these characters illustrates Brutuss honourable and heroic characteristics. The theme of lack of communication proves to be a tr agic fallacy for both Brutus and Portia. If theyd openly shared the problem, the tragic downfall of both characters mightve been avoided. The protagonist of Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov, tells Sonya (Dostoyevsky, 291) that He deserted his family today, so He shant see them anymore. This quote highlights the theme of isolation, caused by his belief in the bermensch theory.Raskolnikov chooses to desert his family because of his superhuman pursuit. However, his speech often reflects irony. His deep trustful relationship with Sonya foreshadows his incapability of achieving the superhuman state. Furthermore, Raskolnikov shows strong concern when Svidrigailov, Raskolnikovs foil and a round antagonist, attempts to harm Dunya, his sister, in Part V of the novel. Contradictory to his words, Raskolnikov reveals the motif of psychological uncertainty, which is virtually related to his punishment. In both novels, the protagonists have attempted to isolate themselves from their families t o achieve greatness.However, they regard their family and friends differently. Brutus is accompanied by friends throughout the play. The flat character, Lucilius, aids with Brutuss dodging by impersonating him (Shakespeare, 5.4.7-8). This loyalty affirms Brutuss well association with his friends and reveals Brutuss nobleness in the eyes of his countrymen. On the other hand, Raskolnikov takes the isolation to a higher level by deserting his friends. He tells Razumikhin, I dont needanyoneIll manage by myselfon my own (Dostoyevsky, 136) The use of ellipsis again depicts the motif of psychological uncertainty. Raskolnikov wants to isolate himself, but his stumbling speech portrays his doubts in his ability to alienate himself. Thus, its quite ironic that he eventually seeks help from Sonya, for redemption, and Razumikhin, for taking care of his family. Shakespeare and Dostoyevsky illustrate the theme of isolation as one of the major themes in their text which contribute to the protagon ists tragic downfalls.Lastly, we find that Shakespeare and Dostoevsky use both good and evil qualities to remember their protagonists. Through this, they are able to successfully provoke the readers empathy despite the characters misjudgements. In the final scene of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony makes a concluding remark about Brutus after he has died, This was the noblest Roman of them all/Brutus only, in a general honest purpose/And common good to all, made one of them./This was a man (Shakespeare, 5.5.68-75) Here, Antony demonstrates his awe and respect for Brutus even though he was part of the conspiracy. The irony is revealed when Antony compliments the murderer of Caesar as noble even though he had previously stirred the crowds against Brutus in Act III.Antonys shrewdness also reflects the motif of nobleness, demonstrated by Brutuss patriotic reason in committing the murder. Using iambic pentameter, Antony praises Brutuss nobility sincerely. His speech reminds the readers of Brutus unselfish sacrifice for his country, simultaneously provoking empathy, enabling readers to associate Brutus more as a hero than that of a sinful criminal. Whereas in Crime and Punishment, in Raskolnikovs confession to Sonya, he says, Id started to search my conscience and ask myself whether I had any right to assume motive over someone else like that meant that I didnt have any such right(Dostoyevsky, 500) This quote from the climax of the novel reflects a milestone in the plot development. By admitting this mistake, that he had no right to commit the murder, is the protagonists first step towards redemption, a major theme of the novel. Also, the novel is written in a third person limited omniscient point of view, thus readers are able to feel Raskolnikovs sorrow and intense emotions in his confession.Readers cant help but sympathize with Raskolnikov and his psychological torment caused by belief in the Ubermensch theory his tragic fallacy. Although the protagonists in the texts, Brutus and Raskolnikov, are murderers, the reasons behind their crimes are different. Brutus contemplates whether or not to kill Caesar and finally decides, It must be by his death. And for my part/I know no personal cause to spurn at him/But for the general (Shakespeare, 2.1.10-13) This quote again illustrates the motif of nobleness. In this quote, Brutus reveals his patriotic and unselfish reason for murdering Caesar in order to benefit the great good. Shakespeare skilfully employs iambic pentameters here to reveal Brutuss nobility and determination in committing such crime. This quote also helps with plot development as it foreshadows Caesars death. Raskolnikov on the other hand, also commits murder but he has his own intentions.Raskolnikov confesses to Sonya, I didnt kill in order to help my mother I didnt kill in order get money or power and thus be able to become a benefactor of mankind. I simply killed for no one but myself what I needed to knowwas whether I was a lou se or a man. (Dostoyevsky, 500) This quote signifies Raskolnikovs motive in committing murder was not based on utilitarianism but personal needs. The anaphora used for rejecting his previous justification of the crime reflects his self-realization. Pride is a motif in the novel. By admitting his misjudgement, Raskolnikov demonstrates his wounded pride. This highlights his psychological growth from the crime. By combining positive and negative characteristics, Shakespeare and Dostoevsky have successfully portrayed the protagonists like real people, possessing flaws and merits.Thus, in the end, both authors have created protagonists who attempt to achieve greatness yet face difficulty in terms of overcoming relationships with important characters in their lives. Such difficulty turn back their paths to greatness as it forces Brutus to find motivation to kill Caesar and as it brings Raskolnikov to realize his inability to follow the bermensch theory for hes unable to overcome human c ompassion.However, both also fight their battles before realizing they were not meant for greatness Brutus and Raskolnikov alienate their loved ones, but discover they cannot endure their absence. This portrayal of the protagonists illustrates how though their deeds are evil, they are still human and suffer as humans do thus earning our empathy where it was first nonexistent. In conclusion, therefore, with such similarities present in each protagonist throughout both stories of radically different timeframes, the authors William Shakespeare and Fyodor Dostoyevsky had evidently shared an ability to establish similar yet effectual protagonists in this case, Shakespeare and Dostoyevsky with their distinctive great minds thought alike indeed.BibliographyDostoevsky, Fyodor. Crime and Punishment. Trans. David McDuff. London PenguinBooks, 2003Shakespeare, William. Julius Caesar. Ed. Roma Gill. Oxford Oxford University Press,

Nvq Level 2 Essay

Unit 21. Understand what is required for competence in own melt down quality 1.1 Describe the duties and responsibilities of own role.My duties are to assisted whilst promoting independence to elderly people with day to day tasks such as ain hygiene care, toileting, getting dressed a and undressed, serving at meal times with some clients needing to be assisted to feed.1.2 Identify standards that influence the way the role is carried out.The standards that influence the way my role is carried out are Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, Manuel Handling Operations Regulations 1992 and Codes of Practice.1.3 Describe ways to discipline personal attitudes or beliefs do not obstruct the quality of work.Ways to ensure personal attitudes or beliefs do not obstruct the quality of work is being aware of own personal attitudes and beliefs, being open and understanding to others attitudes and beliefs and respecting the difference between own and others. Enquire for knowledge and understanding of needs, culture and primer coat of individuals.2. Be able to reflect on own work activities.2.1 Explain why reflecting on answer is an important way to develop knowledge, skills and practice.Reflecting on practice is an important way to develop knowledge, skills and practice as helps make sense of and learn from experiences, develop skills and techniques, understanding what works and what doesnt work, considering what could have been done differently.2.2 prize how well own knowledge, skills and understanding meets standards.2.3 Demonstrate the ability to reflect on work activities.3.Be able to agree a personal development blueprint.3.1 Identify sources of get for own learning and development. Sources of support for own learning and development are my line manager, manager and my assessor. 3.2 Describe the process for agreeing a personal development plan and who should be involved. The process for agreeing a personal development plan is through approximation with my line man ager, back to work interviews with my manager and meetings with my assessor.3.3 Contribute to drawing up own development plan.I contribute to drawing up own development plan by agreeing to objectives for development, understanding needs for specific , measurable, achievable, realistic and measure targets. 4. Be able to develop own knowledge, skills and understanding 4.1 Show how a learning activity has improved own knowledge, skills and understanding. I have done a dementia in house training and this has improved my knowledge, skills and understanding through this learning activity. It shows me how to deal with people with dementia and how it can affects a person. 4.2 Show how reflecting on a situation has improved own knowledge, skills and understand. I find reflecting on a situation helps to look at the situation from different views, which gives me a remediate knowledge and understanding. 4.3 Show how feedback from others has developed own knowledge, skills and understanding. M y manager has received feedback from residents about my level of care I provide which is discussed in my appraisals, we also discuss if either further training is required and if I have any problem. 4.4 Show how to record progress in relation to personal development. When I have an appraisal all topics discussed is record including any personal developments.

Broken Rites in Hamlet

In social club to understand the role of the rites in juncture, one must conceptualize the ritual. The rites in village concern mainly marriage, mourn and funeral. It is crucial to distinguish their specific nature to detect how they participate in the tragedy. Arn elder van Gennep identified and elaborated in his works that birth, puberty, marriage and death are the principal changes in life of an individual and that of the society. He defined and qualified them in the book of the same put forward as The Rites of Passage (Van Geppen).Every passing constitute understands the successive aims of separation, liminality and re-corporation in parliamentary law to allow the emotional adaptation of an individual to the transition. The transition advise be particulary dangerous for the deem of the social life as its cataclysmal habitual order. Since the rites of passage are designed to avoid the possible disturbance when regulating each changing in the society, the impoverished rites of passage concieve the impetus for the desintegration.In the course of this effort to disclose the extent of the depleted rites in Hamlet of how it can affect on disjonction in the play, I will analyse them as the very motor of the tragic in the play. The investigation of the broken rites in Hamlet as those that became infallible when taking in consideration the socio-cultural pecularities of the diachronic period of the 16th and early 17th centuries. The Plague and also the Protestant movement resulted in the abolishment of the funeral rites that could be the last and solely possible defence against the all powerful, inexorable death.In the sequel, the deep and extreme human anxiety before the death rose. In the work of Michael Neil, The Issues of Death Mortality and personal identity in English Renaissance Tragedy, he made apparent how the loss of the ritual is connected with the loss of the identity. In these terms, the investigation of the broken rites is particularly germane(predicate) for the reconsideration of Hamlet because many inerpreters of the work have focused on Hamlets character as the central axis of the tragedy (Coyle). In choosing to focus on rites, one gets a more complex understanding on what occurs in the play and how theproblematical interaction between cultural expectations and individual tendencies are tragically intertwined. Exploring the shopping mall of the broken rites in Hamlet which explicitly stands for unmasking and accusation of the order based on the lies throw the new light upon the mechanism of the tragedy. PART I Broken Rites as the Starting Point of the Tragic Impulse. The play is obsessed with death. Its very exposition is marked by mortal events the old big businessman of Denmark kills the old King of Norway, the majesty of buried Denmark (1. I. I.48) appears as a Ghost. However, the starting point of the tragic impulse is asserted by the broken rites of the funeral and marriage. The mirth in funeral and die rge in mariage/In equal scale weighing delight and dole (2. I. 2. 12). It is consequentially important to conceive that these two broken rites serve for the determinant in the inside disintegration of Hamlet. The dead King, Old Hamlet did not receive the proper sadness, due to him, hence the narration chain of his retentivity is broken. Especially when in a very short time, his wife marries his brother.Two months dead-nay not so much, not two A little month, or ere those shoes were old, With which she followed my poor fathers body a barbarian that wants discourse of reason Would have mourned longer-married with my uncle My fathers brother the salt of most unrighteous tears incestuous sheets(I. 2. 138-154) No windy suspiration of forced breath, /No, nor the fritful river in the eye, /Nor the cast down havior of the visage( I. 2. 79-81). Hamlet is alone to give these mourning duties to your father ( I. 2. 88) and to be dressed in black, while the rest of the court-including the q ueen-are already in the remembrance of ourselves ( I. 2. 7 ) by admitting with pleasure the changes of hierarchy and moral behavior that Claudius institutes The funeral baked meats/Did coldly furnish forth th emarriage tables ( I. 2. 180-181).The origin of the tragic must be observe properly. To do this, it is helpful to refer to Steiners definition of tragedy which is defined as the tragic personage is broken by forces which can neither be full understood, nor overcome by rational prudence Tragedy is irreparable (Dollimore). The irreparable begins with the irreparably broken rites of the funeral and marriage of Hamlets parents, the King and Queen of Denmark that Hamlet assumes on his own. Therefore before learning the truth from the Ghost, which will turn the tragedy into a revenge, the tragedy is set already.Before learning the truth , the hoagys self is unordered O that this too too solid flesh would melt, /thaw and resolve itself into a dew,/Or that the Everlasting had not f ixed/His canon gainst self-s express mirthter ( I. 2. 129-133). Some historical facts are necessary to evoke in order to understand the whole picture of the tragedy. Funeral and mourning rites were substantial in the Elizabethan period maingly in order to maintain the social order and the psychological defense against mortality (Tylliard).The Plague had brought in the brutal abolishment of funeral rites wherein the mass burial chambers of all classes have no preeminence in common pits without any hierarchy. The denial of the purgatory by Protestants resulted into a painfully private apocalypse, placing the deceased beyond our help (Neil). The tormenting thoughts that death strikes anyone at any importation and that a king may go a progress by dint of the guts of beggar (4. 3. 30) roused extreme anxiety on the issues of death. This anxiety has developed into a profound meditation on mortality and identity.That is why the melancholic character Hamlet had always his eyes turned into his very soul. The certitude of anything, the balance were beyond any human power or will and hence any change faceed even more tormenting. The marriage to a deceased husbands brother was disallow by the Church, whether Catholic or Protestant (Shakespear). Claudius introduces the unnatural marriage by the shift from our sometimes sister to wife ( I. 2. 8-14). Therefore it is an already irreparably broken marriage rite before learning that Gertrude was seduced and then committed adultery in the sacred marriage.The role of the rites of passage is to guarantee the smooth adaptation to change. precisely Hamlet was stuck in the phase of limination even before learning the truth from the Ghost. His limination phase was his mourning. He was between the live and the death, where the death was the material category. The impossibility of his passage out of mourning was reinforced by the fact that he already mentioned that he is the only mourned, hence twicely isolated. The phase of re-in corporation to the world of the dead is the most authoritative in the funeral rite (Van Geppen 210).Assurance was not given to Old Hamlet, as there was no separation and liminality. Separation he was honored no relief, no catharsis Cut off even in the blossoms of my sin,/Unhouseled, dis-appointed, unaneled, /No reckoning made, plainly sent to my account/With all my imperfections on my head. Limination no proper mourning. In the sequel, The King Hamlet was not re-incorporated and that is why he appears as a Ghost. He is ineffectual to reach the country from wich nor traveller returns( 3. 1. 80-81).Horatios words about the Ghost seem unrelevant at first reading but in reality they are important for the perception of the tragedy structure. What if it tempt you toward the flood, my lord,/Or to the dreadful summit of pearl Which might deprive your soveregnty of reson/and draw you into madness? ( 1. 4. 48-53) The individuals that were not accorded with the proper funeral rites could never integrate into the world of the dead. This kind of dead was particularly dangerous as they were seek to penetrate there at the expense of the living beings. Usually they were marked by the desire of vengeance (Van Geppen 229-230).The passage out the liminality is possible only through the successful re-incorporation (Van Geppen 211). Can King Hamlet be re-incorporated if Hamlet revenges? Or does the chase to repair forever broken store the true mousetrap for the hero himself? The same the re-incorporation phase of mariage is never re-incorporated by Hamlet. His mother not only reintegrated in the social life, but she lives her new marriage in the amplitude of plaesures. Having been re-incorporated by others, the rite of marriage does not concern the court as it concerns Hamlet.The latter has not passed through the phases and that is why he finds himself ruptured from society. To reconstitute the inverted natural order of things, Hamlet must restore the broken chain of narrati on. His father must be remembered and Claudius must be punished. PART II Sleeping Dog besides what restoring the memory that is restoring the broking rites inserts for the hero? Is his invocation for a retribution a possibility to reahibilitate the former natural order or is it a course towards an inevitable tragic end? One of the heros attempts to restore the memory is the introducing of the Moustrap.The broken rites great instigation of the unnatural is contrasting with the situation in the speech on Priams slaughter. He maternalism and for a robe,/About her lank and fall oer-teemed loins, A blanket in thalarum (2. 2. 498-99), wouild have made milch the burning eyes (2. 2. 508) is opposed to Gertrudes adulltry unrighteous tears( 1. 2. 155). Hecube mourning was so intense that the death or the Fortunes Wheel would treason have pronounced (2. 2. 502). It stressed the potent power of the rite. When the rite is devoutly respected, it can go through the miracles.After his successful attempt to reveal the truth, Hamlet does not kill Claudious during his attempt to pray because he must ensure the bad phase of separation for him and not to send him to heaven. He must be killed in the blossom of his sin as Old Hamlet to get stuck in the tormenting limination phase. Trying to resrore the irrepareble broken rites by restoring the memory of his father, the hero has desperately condemened to the tragic end. The atonement of the obscure past is impossible without the occurence of new tragic events. As a consequence, the individual crisis of Hamlet was bonny more contradictive and more tormenting.The successive broken rites were reperpetuted throughout the play the Rosencrantz and Guildenstern deaths, the hugger-mugger way of Polonius burial which causes the disjunction in the minds of his children. It is relevant here to mark that Ophelia suffered sooner the similar inner disintegration issued from the broken rites than that of Hamlet. Her fathers death was insulting ly dishonorable. The marriage that she prepared was abolished and hence, she can only be analyzed as stuck in the phase of the liminality. The songs in her madness speak out Larded with sweet flowers, /Which bewept to the grave did not go /With true-love showers. You promised me to wed. Stricktly speaking, the death of innocent Ohelia is provoked by these two broken rites introducing a new variotion on mirth in funeal and dierge in marriage I thought thy bridebed to have decked, sweet maid (5. 1. 154). The inexorable insistence on the irreparable collapse caused by the broken rites works up the tragedy. So considering Ophelias death doubtful, the priest deprieves her from the correct obsequious rites Yet here she is allowed her virgin rites ( 5. 1. 222) Hamlet And such maimed rites? This doth betoken/ The corpse they follow did with desprate hand ( 5. 1. 209-210).Moreover, one of the Clown concludes that if this had not been a gentlewoman, she have been buried out of Christian buria l (5. 1. 23-24). Ophelias tragic accompined by the tokens of floral innocence end seems to be one of the most dramatic and the ambigues quarrel of Hamlet and Laertes on her coffin only exacerbates the business of restoring the rememberance. Claudious is speculating on the rite of mourning, when inciting Laertes agaings Hamlet. Was your father dear to you? /Or are you like the painting of sorrow,/A face without a heart? ( 4. 7. 95-96). The rite stakes in the sort To cut his throat ithchurch ( 4. 7. 103).PART III The effect on the identity or how the broken rites change the perception of life Exploring the anxieties and in particular the anxieties concerning the funeral and mourning rites, the play is imminently influenced by the memento mori traditions. Making apparent the similitude of the skulls in the scene with the grave-diggers, Hamlet broods on the subject of death. The tragic emphasis step up when unwillingly but opportunately the grief of Ophelias death was fractured by the joking with the Yourick skull Now get you to my ladys chamber, and tell her, let her paint and inch thick, to this favor she must come.Make her laugh at that( 5. 1. 184-185). And accordingly if addressed to the living this joke would have brought rather melancholy than joy. Melancholy emerges with the awareness of the loss of a geocentric and athropocentric universe, the loss of the centre. In this mesh, the melancholic finds the opportunity to re-centre himself (Curti 156-157). Hamlet is trying to reconstitute himself through the restoration of the rememeberance which became his obsession. In the last scenes of the play, Hamlet was getting more and more aware of the imporance of the a good death also for himself.The issue of the suicide was left aside in the first two acts. Hamlet percieved that the good end may be guaranteed by noone, but oneself. Readiness is all (5. 2. 169). This equivocal statement accounts also for the excuses that Hamlet presents to Laertes before his possib le end. The soldiers music and the rites of war/ Speak loudly for him (5. 2. 352-53) can not truely be appease the initial disjointing of time and state. Even if the solemn obsequious march that ends the play indemnify on a certain level the lack of the accomplished rite, Fortinbras is a foreigner and the former enemy who had taken the rule in his hands.The cost of this truly delivered ( 5. 2. 338) restoration of a piece of memory is the tragic end of the whole kindom. Conlcusion Exploring the role of the broken rites in Hamlet as the motor of the tragic in the play cannot be a delusion, but is a broad field of research of the precision in the approaches of the understanding of the tragedy. Alternatively, from the very broken cemectries of Caesars Rome and to the groteskly solemn funeral rites on Hamlets honor, the broken rites are corroborate to possessan an eldritch power to affect on the social as well as on the individual.Proving their susceptibility to unremitting reproduction of the new broken rites that contain us towards a more sophisticated account of the mechanism of the emergence of the successive tragic impulses in the play, the critical reading of the play from the broken rites axis. look in mind the social and cultural context of the 16 th and early 17th centuries and in particular the memento mori and the arts of death traditions, the play does not impend the remorseless broken rites to gratify the tragedy. Works Cited Coyle, Martin. Hamlet. UK Palgrave Macmillan, 1992.Curti, Lidia. Female Stories, Female Bodies. Narrative identity and Representation. New York Macmillan Press, 1998. Dollimore, Jonathan. Radical Tragedy Religion, Ideology and antecedent in the Drama of Shakespeare and his Contemporaries. New York Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1984. Neil, Michael. Issues of Death Mortality and Identity in English Renaissance Tragedy. Oxford Clarendon Press, 1998. Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Ed. G. R. Hibbard. Oxford Oxford UP, 1987. Tylliard, Eustac e M. W. The Elizabethan World Picture. US Penguin, 1990. Van Geppen, Arnold. Les Rites de Passage.

My Name Is Asher Lev

Name Waleed Khokhar Date 11/13/12 Word Count appx 900 Which character intrigues you the most(prenominal)? The protagonist and narrator of the book, My name is Asher Lev Asher Levs stratum begins with him as a young boy from a Jewish family. A young boy who lived in conservative community that was strict and fascist in nature when it comes to religion. Two conflicting forces play an important role in Asher Levs story. One, Asher Levs up tight and all- encompassing unearthly community, and the other his intense passion and desire to create art.Throughout Asher Levs life history as a young child and as an adult, he had to trade-off between his love of creating art and/or following his family and community religious traditions. How Asher grows up with such intense friction in his head teacher of these two subjects is something important to elucidate. The decisions he made and the actions he took shaped his future. Asher grew up in an old-fashioned Jewish community of Ladover a commu nity filled with narrow-minded people who did not take to panorama at the knowledge base beyond their realms. Due to this, Asher Lev was always in conflict with himself, his family and the community.As Aryeh, Asher Levs fix said, If you were a sorcerer in mathematics, I would understand. If you were a genius in writing, I would also understand. If you were a genius in Gemorra, I would certainly understand. However, a genius in drawing is foolishness, and I will not let it interfere with our lives. Do you understand me, Asher? (pg. 136). Ashers father always condemned his work and wanted him to give up art. However, art surrounded and reflected in every part of Ashers life. It is interesting to see even under immense pressure of his father Asher keepd to draw.Usually, kids drop dead rebellious if restricted. In this case, Asher just suppressed his feelings and confined to himself. Ashers personality is the most mesmerizing in this book. Living in a strictly religious family as boy and continually opposed by several people on creating art, Asher still managed to heed his passion. It was a marvel in its own. Nonetheless, these two aspects of life balance out each other and play the most apprehensive part in his life. Ashers creativity is one of the reasons he was able to continue with his work.One can see this when Asher uses common life material and create tools to paint (citation required). It is obvious that Asher possessed the gift of drawing.. Another aspect one needs to look at is Ashers desperation and his urge to find such creative ways to enunciate him in form of art. He was burning with desire to express his emotions by drawing. On one occasion, his strong influences lead him to steal paints from a shop. However, ethics and morals from his family teachings embedded in him evoked his conscience, and he eventually re cancelled them.Such endeavors, at such a young age, living in such ascetic society requires a lot of guts. It brings the crisp an d twist in a story and binds a reader to discover of what lies ahead. In addition, it is hard to ignore how a young child with such creativity uses such ingenious ways to pursue his passion as Asher uses ashes to paint. It reminds me of a famous idiom necessity is the mother of invention. In the beginning, Asher did not understand his cravings as a child and innocuously doodled which turned into structured drawing later in his life.Furthermore, an on-going friction permeated inside Asher. He was wooly with what was allowed to draw and what was deemed intolerable in his community. This is most evident when Ashers father would not come to Ashers art exhibitions, which displayed nude and crucifixion pictures. Asher justified such painting by saying (Book 11, pg. 303), A naked women is a women without clothes. A nude is an artists personal vision of a body without clothes. Is such a personal vision important in your art? Thats what art is, Papa.Its a persons hole-and-corner(a) visio n expressed in aesthetic. This brings Asher in the contradiction to his upbringing, what his beliefs were and what the world of art wants. It is astonishing for a reader of how Asher intumesce aware that his father reproved nude paintings and insofar without hesitation he invites his father. An analysis to this could be that Asher was so lost in the hymn of his passion that his childhood values were fading away. Whether these values would instill in Asher is something that intrigues a reader to continue with the story.Additionally, Ashers interaction with an artist named Jacob Kahn, who immensely drew Asher towards new dimensions of art played the most significant role in this story. Asher reckons different styles of painting and hones his skills under Kahns mentorship. Working with Kahn once again Asher faces the dilemma of whether to follow his religious teachings or follow the eccentric ways of world of art. Kahn played a pivotal role in Ashers life and persuaded him to draw nude and crucifixion pictures, which were against Ashers religion, Asher hesitant but open to learn suppressed his feelings and drew.Here once again, Asher prioritized art over his family and religion. In contrast, it is evident that Asher has not completely strayed away from his religious teaching as he continued to hold on his Jewish dietary laws when he was away at Kahns beach house. Likewise, Asher leaves the reader tangled that whether he would lean back to his childhood education or ensue the world of art. Finally, the most controversial side of Asher becomes flamboyant when he drew his mothers picture in form of crucifixion and invited his parents to his exhibition.Asher was well aware that his painting would bring great pain to his family and his community as crucifixion in Judaism is a taboo. Asher knowing the consequences will be dire in so far he prioritized artistic world over Jewish world. From Ashers point of view, this drawing only portrayed his emotions and it was targeted toward world of art where it carries a different kernel and only artists understand its value, whereas, Jewish community was naive of language of paint. Asher motive to invite his parents to gallery is questionable.A concern that arises is why Asher would invite his family to his exhibition. Did he deliberately want to inflict pain to his family and finally part away or was it another episode of innocence. The most bewildering scenes of this book which must have left several readers confused was in the ending chapter of the book where Asher stood thinking about his decisions in his life. Asher had to decide whether he wanted himself or religion himself or family and/or himself or art.Similarly, the writer has portrayed Ashers uncanny nature and it leaves many questions in a readers mind. The book concludes in many ways unresolved, as Asher was not fully soothing with the decisions he had made. My Name is Asher Lev ends with protagonist banished from his people as Rebbe as ked him to leave. So far, there are no means to conclude that Asher had embarked himself away from his family and community. No conclusive or unanimous consensus about Ashers future choices

The Difference Between Analytic and Speculative Philosophy

ism is an Academic discipline that exercises reason and logic in an attempt to understand reality and coiffe fundamental questions some( claim) turn inledge, life, morality and homosexual nature. philosophical system is the root of whole k nary(prenominal)ledge. It is considered as mformer(a) of all told informations. Philosophy helps to coordinate the various activities of individual and the society. It helps to understand the signifi canfulce of all human experiences. Philosophy develops a comprehensive system of thoughts about the universe and life as whole. Etymologically ism comes from Greek word called FILOSOFIA FILO factor love, SOFIA means knowledge/wisdom.Therefore philosophical system means love of knowledge/wisdom. Philosophy is meet alike a tree because it has different branches. For instance main aras of the playing area in philosophical system include metaphysics it is the prove of general features reality such as existence, succession and relationsh ip between mind and body, EPISTEMOLOGY touch with the nature and extent of knowledge, LOGIC is the study of principles of correct reasoning, ethics is dealing with moral conduct, and AETHETICS dealing with beauty. There is also philosophy of mind, philosophy of law, social philosophy and philosophy of science.A person who studies philosophy is called PHILOSOPHER like SOCRATES, PLATO, and ARISTOTLE. Through the ages, philosophers befuddle sought to answer such questions as, What is means and purpose of life? , Does God exist? , What does it mean to possess consciousness? , and What is the value of morals? ,. Philosophers attempt to answer such questions through the philosophical method. The methods usually begins when a philosopher take aparts his own beliefs and begins to doubt their validity. From his doubt, question emerge before answering a questions, the philophers thoroughly analyzes it to ensure it is clear and properly defined.This helps to narrow the path to the more or less precise answer. Nexit, the philosopher propose reasoned arguments to support each one. Philosophy itself is generally considered a type of social science, like sociology or psychology. Thats because early philosophy was primarily concerned with describing the best way to live and organize society. From that spawned many other disciplines Economics, Political science, Law linguistics, literary and Art criticism, and Theology along with Theology and Psychology. Though many of philosophys original topics have evolved into other fields of study over time the discipline remains rich and varied.Modern philosophy contain six main branches of each with their own unique focus Metaphysics is the study of nature of reality and universe. Epistemology the study knowledge and how it is acquired. Ethics the study of rights and wrong and how should slew should live. Politics the study of government, citizen rights and political. Aesthetics the study of beauty, art and autistics perception. 1. Carefully examine the critical proletariat of philosophy. Philosophy in short refers to the mans quest of the unity of knowledge, a perpetual struggle to create the concepts that allow the universe to be seen as integrate rather than as fragmented.Philosophy involves two separate but complimentary tasks critical and constructive. The characteristics described below extend almost entirely within the critical task of philosophy, which involves posing difficult and probing questions about true statement claims. The critical task of philosophy involves posing difficult questions about truth claims whenever they are put forward that is to ask or to speak what right is this or that believe to be accorded. The purpose of such questioning is non of course to destroy or attract down pat(p) the truth but rather to purge it for error.The constructive task of philosophy aims at developing the whole of reality in which every tone of human knowledge and every aspect of human experien ce go forth find its proper place The critical and constructive aspects of philosophy are thusly not independent, but interdependent. There is little point in critiquing the ideas and proposals of others without having nearthing substantive to offer instead, just as at that place is little point in pass ideas without being willing to both critique them yourself and having others provide critiques.Irreligious atheists may be justified in critiquing religion and theism, but they shouldnt do so without being satisfactory to offer something in their place. It is assumed that truth is stronger than error and that under the critical questioning of philosophy truth will survive and hopefully error will not. Hence to the extent that philosophy performs this task effectively. Philosophy contributes to the advancement of human knowledge by locating errors that might otherwise retard its progress.A good modelling is shown by Socrates by his unique task of interrogating his fellow citize ns to show whether or not there opinions could stand up under close scrutiny. Whenever Socrates found people holding opinions or making truth claims he went to recreate . for instance meno claims to know whether or not moral excellence can be taught. Socrates would ask, meno what is virtue? , how can you know whether or not it can be taught? And for instance Euthypro claims to know that his father is guilty of impiety, Socrates would say Euthyphro I do not even know for sure what piety and impiety are.Could you instruct me in this? Therefore a situation of going about questioning people to test about the firmness of purpose of their opinions refers to what called the critical task of philosophy. Conclusively we all take many things for granted and everything we do is either determined by or affected by our assumptions, most of the time we are scarcely aware of them and it is through this assumptions that underlie our supposed knowledge that the philosopher is chiefly interested i n them. The philosopher wants to know whose assumptions are reasonable and whose assumptions are unreasonable.Intodays world the critical task of philosophy is conducted formally, and for that reason the questions that philosophersraise are not direct so much at individuals but are directed to fields of learning. The philosophers dont question the scientists but question the assumptions and truth claims of science, the philosophers dont question the religious person but question the truth claims of religion. Unlike in the 5th century where Socrates conducted the critical task of philosophy informallyand went around questioningindividuals. 2.With relevant examples examine the battle between analytical and speculative philosophy Analytic philosophy is the type of philosophy in which we analyze all fundamental assumptions (claims) for all the sciences. The claim of social sciences, religious, ethics. There is no area unexpended unchecked. Analysis is the breaking down of words into s mall parts. For example, a husband is a married man therefore husband is an analyzed concept plot a married man is the compend of the concept. In analytic philosophy we analyze the concept and check its validity by testing the analysis.For instance, a sister is a young female sibling we have to ask ourselves different questions from this concept, first question is that, are all sisters young female siblings? The answer is no. The second question is, all young sisters are siblings? The answer is yes. Due to this we have two different answers, therefore the analysis is monstrous. For the analysis to be incorrect it requires that all the sentences are true, that is to say all things that fall under the analyzed concept must fall under its analysis andalso all the things that fall under the analysis of a concept must also fall under the analyzed concept.Speculative philosophy is the type of philosophy which tries to bring together all the sciences that as biological, physical and so cial sciences. Originally it starts to inquire about the nature of different phenomena. To speculate is to go beyond the experience it is guessing in other words. For example, is there an immortal soul? Is there life after death? Speculative concept is something that cannot be examined scientifically. It contains things that no one can see.It is generally unscientific philosophy. Analytic philosophy and Speculative philosophy tends to differ in certain things. The following are the differences between analytic philosophy and speculative philosophy. Analytic philosophy emphasizes on logic, language and aligns itself with the empirical sciences. In analytic philosophy, it inquiries into the meaning of the concept we use and try to avoid to use vague terms that do not fit into their logical, linguistic and empirical methods. For example square is a figure in equal sides. The language which used is clear and gives us clear meaning of the concept.But in speculative philosophy, philosophe rs tends to use terms that do not fit with our simple experience of the world in other words, they use abstract words. For example, Is there an immortal soul? The concept is an abstract one, as it requires one to go beyond experience in order to find the truth of the concept. Another difference is that, analytic philosophy, it concepts can be examined scientifically that is through checking its validity. There are several stages in order to give an analysis . You first start with a candidate analysis for example a square is a figure in equal sides.Then you test the analysis, if it still gives wrong answer you must cleanse that analysis like a square is a figure in four equal sides. From there you test the improved analysis if it still has some ambiguity you test it again in order to give a clear meaning of a concept, so the correct concept will be a figure in four equal sides and only right angles. But in Speculative philosophy, its concept cannot be scientifically examined. , beca use it contains things that cannot be seen by anyone it is unscientific philosophy for example, is there an immortal soul?This concept is abstractive one because no one can see a soul, and so scientific method cannot be applicable. Then in speculative philosophy seeking for new observation in the fact that through observing things not that deep but only observing since there is no why questions in speculative philosophy but in analytic philosophy it analyses statements to break down the philosophical concepts to make clear understanding of the concepts for example husband is a married man, therefore a husband is analyzed concept while a married man is the analysis of the concept.This has why and who questions. Furthermore, speculative philosophy seeks to establish new understanding of different concepts as long as it is seeking for new observation therefore it establishes the new understandings for example dealing with the disasters like diseases existing that never existed before but on the side of Analytic philosophy is just prescribing the existing concepts but does not entail new understanding of the concepts in the fact that it deals with and analyzing the existing concepts not establishing new understanding.Therefore even though the speculative and analytic philosophy they differ but both speculative philosophy and analytic philosophy they assemble on helping in bringing together the science subjects like physics, biology as well as chemistry and social sciences, also enables mind to have a critical reflection before it makes a judgement. it also enables man to make clarification of what is right and what is wrong as well as making minds in quick understanding of issues. 3. With concrete examples examine the role and function of analytic philosophy.Analytic philosophy is the type of philosophy which examines the bases claims of religion science and ethics. It is also called linguistic philosophy. It is relating as the approach to philosophical problems , dominant in Anglo-American philosophy from the early 20th century. The following are the roles and functions of analytic philosophy It emphasis on the study of language and logical analysis of concepts, although most work of analytic philosophy has been done in great Britain and the united states and significant contributions have also been done to other countries.Analytical philosophy analyses the fundamental assumption of all science. The claim of physical science, social science or religion For instance All bachelors are unmarried there is no need to know anything about the world to conclude that this proposition is true because the terms bachelors means someone who is Unmarried. Analytic philosophy is always an attempt of clarification, one of its problems we have such as we have as the people is to clarify the issues in our lives, clarify the ideas concepts and an assumption.In its primary sense analytic philosophy is used to describe philosophy that proceeds via analysis by seeking to understand the composition of its subject matter out of simple components. Analytic philosophy provides the statements (analytic statement) that are true merely by virtue of definitions of their terms. Examples of analytic statements are Frozen ice is water, Bachelors are unmarried men, No addition meaning or knowledge is contained in predicate that is not already given in the subject. Analytic statements are redundant statements whose clarification relies entirely on definition.Analytic sentences tell us about logic and about language use. Therefore, sometimes the best way to understand an aspect of philosophy is to look at a selection of the important thinkers therein, since a consideration of the questions they concerned themselves with can help us appreciate the overall areas within which they worked, as it were. This is especially so here because its difficult to say exactly what analytic philosophy is. Although there is only space to touch on a selection of ideas an d problems, they should make clearer the range and scope of what goes by that name.

Ladylikeness empowering or demeaning

Ladyfingers piece of tail be empowering or demeaning depending on the womanhood and the circumstance. Ladyfingers can be empowering for women by helping them be much gentle and fruitful in frequent life. Ladyfingers can cause a woman who is more of the calm type to be demeaned, disrespected and dismissed. Women become more high-pressure and assertive because they dont want to be treated unfairly and women taken serious. Most women who argon booming and acknowledged in society today display strength.A definition of ladyfingers is lacking in strength, force, or virility. Ladyfingers for a womanhood M who is rough, destructive, vulgar and violent would be empowering. She bequeath be empowered by organism more gentle and fruitful in everyday life. For example, this woman being more nurturing toward her children and taking meter to listen and understand before acting on impulse. Ladyfingers for a Woman N who is meek, gentle, weak and nice would not be demeaning until she tries t o stand up for a belief or position.Woman N will be demeaned by being discouraged and falling short of her position. The more timid she is the easier it is for race to throw out her and her ideas. The more she is shot down people will look at her less seriously. The more people see how weak she is they will be comfortable with dismissing her. A definition of demean Is to lower character, status, or temper. There are many things that can lower character, status, or reputation. For example, a loss of wages, a loss of respect, a loss of a position, etc.Ladyfingers should not demean a woman. I am take for granted the word lady In the word ladyfingers Implies that ladyfingers Is safe for women. Therefore, a woman being ladylike should not be lowered in character, status or reputation. If a lady can be ladylike without nix percussion, then who can? The definition of ladyfingers Implies that being womanish and resilient cannot co-exalts to nurtureher In one woman. The chief(prenomin al) reason ladyfingers raises a concern for women Is because women dont want to be treated unfairly and women want to be heard.The women In society today who are sure-fire In their craft are assertive and aggressive. Women who are aggressive and assertive may be Intimidating plainly they are the women who made It out of the shadows and Into a spotlight. all in all women need strength to be Independent and adequate at what Is required of them In their dally lives Ladyfingers can be empowering or demeaning depending on the woman and the circumstance. Ladyfingers raises concern for women. Therefore, ladyfingers raises a concern for women.Ladyfingers Is empowering for women Like Woman M barely causes Woman N to become put down overtime. According to the definitions women who are successful today are not ladylike and this Is fine. These women combated what was against them In such a way that they accomplished their goals and get where they wanted to be. However, women should be able to be ladylike without worrying about being treated unfairly, lose and disrespected. Dillydallies empowering or demeaning By lady dismissing her. A definition of demean is to lower character, status, or reputation. Mean a woman. I am assuming the word lady in the word ladyfingers implies that ladyfingers is safe for women. Therefore, a woman being ladylike should not be repercussion, then who can? The definition of ladyfingers implies that being feminine and resilient cannot co-exist together in one woman. The main reason ladyfingers raises a concern for women is because women dont want to be treated unfairly and women want to be heard. The women in society today who are successful in their craft are assertive and aggressive.Women who are aggressive and assertive may be intimidating but they are the women who made it out of the shadows and into a spotlight. All women need strength to be independent and sufficient at what is required of them in their daily lives Ladyfingers can be w omen. Ladyfingers is empowering for women like Woman M but causes Woman N to become put down overtime. According to the definitions women who are successful today are not ladylike and this is fine. These women combated what was against them in such a way that they accomplished their goals and get where they

Community College Essay

After graduating high rail a lot of people do non know what their next step in life history will be. any(prenominal) struggle between deciding to go straight into the workforce, joining the military, or chronic their education by going to college. The average person chooses college as their next step. A common do about going to college is whether to go to a two-year college/ conjunction college or straight into a four-year university. I think residential area college is the smarter and better choice.People fail to realize that going to familiarity college helps you save thousands of dollars. not only that, but students with undetermined major better find their look succession saving specie at community colleges. They are very flexible and can provide students with a better mutation from high discipline while advantageing from their littler class sizes and campuses. As we all know, community college is cheaper to attend than a four-year university. Four-year universiti es represent thousands of dollars while attending a community college would cost less than half of that.For instance, the average cost of attendance at Northern Virginia confederacy College (NOVA) is roughly 5,000 dollars per year for a freshman, compared to the cost of attendance at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) which is about 25,000 dollars a year for freshmen. The cost of attending VCU is fives times as much as attending NOVA where in retrospect the same material is being overlayed. To break it down, tuition and fees at VCU join to about 12,000 dollars. One honor subject mention costs about 300 dollars while at NOVA a credit costs 150 dollars.Room and board would be 9,000 dollars at VCU, while going to NOVA in intimately cases you would not have to pay to live at home if you are a freshman. Books would still be around the same price because books in college are expensive regardless. Other expenses would vary depending on what a student would need. Looking back on i t the cost of going to a community college saves you a grand measuring rod of capital and would be worth it in the long run. Growing up people would talk of the town about community college as if it were basically the thirteenth grade.In a sense would not that benefit a student more? Classes at four-year universities can sometimes be overwhelming, having hundreds of students in one rebuke class. With classes wankting hard from the transition of high school to college, would not a student want little class sizes? It only seems reasonable. By having smaller class sizes a student would naturally be able to learn better than in a class full of 300 people. Lecture classes can be long, tiring, and filled with millions of questions.In bigger classes some communication issues might occur and information might not ceaselessly get to a student depending on their seating. Also the professors might not forever get to a question that a student may have which can get very frustrating. Ha ving smaller class sizes, everything is right there in front of a student. The professor is there for easier access to questions, class discussions would be more beneficial and easier to get involved with, and a person would get to know their classmates more. littler class sizes would help students gain a better learning experience.Many people go into college undecided on what they want their major to be. Studies prove that 50% of students who declared their major change them later on their commencement year according to Dr. Firtz Grupe of mymajors. com. Some students even change their majors up to three times byout college. overtaking to community college can help a student find out their major while saving money. When a student changes majors there are always some complications. Some classes that were necessary for their previous major have nothing to do with the current major that they just switched to.The money that was pay for those credits is, for the most part, wasted. That can be very taxing on a students financial income. If these problems occurred to a student who was attending a four-year college they would have wasted thousands of dollars compared to if a student changed majors at a community college. Even though money is lost in both cases, the amount of money lost at a community college is far more manageable than losing thousands of dollars at a four-year college.Think about it this way, would you rather lose 100 dollars or 10,000? club college is a great way for students with undecided majors to discover what they want to do while not losing as much money and time. Classes at community colleges are very flexible and can help students manage their classes around early(a) things. People who attend community colleges sometimes seek business concerns while in school. One thing that could be very frustrating for a student would be having class at a time that conflicts with a work schedule.That could be a problem if a student at a four-year university had a job because not as much dark classes are offered at four-year colleges. Community colleges have better options in that case. A student working a regular 9-5 schedule would find problems trying to go to school after work. At community college classes could easily be taken after work with more night classes being offered at a community college. Students can go to work then school or vice versa, go to school in the morning then work some time after without any hardships.Having flexible classes are always a benefit because they provide more options and having options are always a good thing. Community colleges provide an easier transition from the laid back high school surroundings to the stressful college life. As Liz Addison says, it helps students begin. High school classes are easier compared to classes in college. Grading wise and tests, quizzes, etc. Community college can help ease a student into the college atmosphere. That classes are not that much easier tha n that of a community college but not as hard all.It is a step up from high school in terms of difficulty and helps to better transition students into the university world. Less stress is involved and things are more manageable. Some people argue many things about community colleges. The main thing often associated with community college is transpose . People say that commuting to community college cost so much money in regards to gas. Community colleges are in your community and most of the times have ways to get you to and from school. They are called community colleges for a reason.All the money that a student would save from not going to a four-year college would cover the cost of gas easily. Also most community colleges have operating bus systems and car pooling is always an option. Another thing people try to argue about going to a community college is that a person will not gain a true college experience. Some people go through life and do not experience many things like ne ver being on a plane, not having a dog, or even never going to a football game. That experience is not something that a student would need to have to become successful in life.The rewards of getting to where you want to be in life are far greater than not getting a full college experience. In the long run you will make up for the experiences you have missed by gaining better ones. Going to a two-year college first before transferring to a four-year university pays off in the long run. People either do not know the benefits or are two proud to attend a community college. Money is saved, the learning experience is better, the transition from high school is easier and community colleges help undeclared majors find their majors. Seems like the smart way to go.